From Sippycable@aol.com Sun Aug 27 20:36:02 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Sun, 27 Aug 95 20:36:01 -0500; AA07393 Received: from mail04.mail.aol.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Sun, 27 Aug 95 20:35:59 -0500 Received: by mail04.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id VAA07082 for bucky@cs.wisc.edu; Sun, 27 Aug 1995 21:35:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Aug 1995 21:35:52 -0400 From: Sippycable@aol.com Message-Id: <950827213551_64824606@mail04.mail.aol.com> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Subject: Re: UW Soccer Schedules Brent Moss was waived by Miami today, as were Joe Rudolph by Philadelphia and Chad Cascadden by the Jets. Lee DeRamus was placed on some non-injury inactive list by the Saints a couple of weeks ago. Donny Brady was waived by Cleveland a few weeks back also. A guy who covers the Dolphins told me that if Moss clears waivers, the Dolphins will almost definitely put him on their practice squad. From djrose@pipeline.com Tue Aug 29 22:00:18 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Tue, 29 Aug 95 22:00:14 -0500; AA09262 Received: from mail.nyc.pipeline.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Tue, 29 Aug 95 22:00:10 -0500 Received: from pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com (pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com [198.80.32.46]) by mail.nyc.pipeline.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id XAA06712; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 23:00:07 -0400 From: "David J. Rosen" Received: (djrose@localhost) by pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com (8.6.10/8.6.9) id XAA09741; Tue, 29 Aug 1995 23:00:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 23:00:04 -0400 Message-Id: <199508300300.XAA09741@pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Cc: djrose@pipeline.com Subject: Re: Topic: McCullough, Roberson or Stecker? On Tue, Aug 29, 1995 1:00:04 AM at Ben Stapleton wrote: > I say fullback Branden Cantrell is key to the offense. Where would >Moss and Fletcher have gone without Montgomery in 1993? Can Cantrell and >freshman Cecil Martin step up? > > Comment? Don't forget the contributions of Ron Johnson at FB last season. He had only one carry all year, but became an excellent receiver out of the backfield and also an outstanding lead blocker for Fletcher/Moss. Johnson has one year of eligibility remaining, so maybe he'll be able to come back next season. It seems like neither of the two FB's has been able to establish any clear dominance over the other, and they'll proably both get a lot of playing time. As to the RB's, I think Alvarez would like McC to emerge as the clear no. 1 back. I see Stecker coming in as a change of pace,because his running style is so different from the other two. I thought Roberson looked good in the mop-up at the end of last year's Colorado game, but I don't see him getting a lot of carries this Saturday. Of course, McCullough has not been the most durable guy, having missed all of last season and then the spring game. David J. Rosen From Sippycable@aol.com Wed Aug 30 01:10:07 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 01:10:04 -0500; AA11619 Received: from mail06.mail.aol.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 01:10:02 -0500 Received: by mail06.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id CAA15917 for bucky@cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 02:10:01 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 02:10:01 -0400 From: Sippycable@aol.com Message-Id: <950830020959_86829239@mail06.mail.aol.com> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Subject: nflbadgers The Jets signed Chad Cascadden on Tuesday, two days after waiving him, and placed him on their practice squad. I have no word on others. From todd@ra.me.wisc.edu Wed Aug 30 09:31:57 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 09:31:54 -0500; AA16832 Received: from ra.me.wisc.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 09:31:52 -0500 Received: by ra.me.wisc.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Jun95-0754PM) id AA13108; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:33:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:33:10 -0500 From: Todd Jekel Message-Id: <9508301433.AA13108@ra.me.wisc.edu> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu In-Reply-To: <199508300300.XAA09741@pipe6.nyc.pipeline.com> (djrose@pipeline.com) Subject: Re: Topic: McCullough, Roberson or Stecker? Don't forget the contributions of Ron Johnson at FB last season. He had only one carry all year, but became an excellent receiver out of the backfield and also an outstanding lead blocker for Fletcher/Moss. Johnson has one year of eligibility remaining, so maybe he'll be able to come back next season. Ron Johnson has left the program. His injury was career ending. It's a shame. Todd -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Todd Jekel todd@ra.me.wisc.edu University of Wisconsin---Madison Solar Energy Laboratory 1500 Engineering Drive Madison, WI 53706 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From todd@ra.me.wisc.edu Wed Aug 30 09:43:48 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 09:43:46 -0500; AA16942 Received: from ra.me.wisc.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 09:43:43 -0500 Received: by ra.me.wisc.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Jun95-0754PM) id AA14478; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:45:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:45:01 -0500 From: Todd Jekel Message-Id: <9508301445.AA14478@ra.me.wisc.edu> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu In-Reply-To: (MISKOWSKI@vilas.uwex.edu) Subject: Re: This Weekend On tOSU: I agree, they looked impressive. Last year I thought George was overated (based on his first game), but he really impressed me. But, I think quite a few of us could run the ball behind Orlando Pace! Holy sh*t! He should count as 2 on the field. :) On UofM: I thought they were really overated in the polls based solely on the fact that they lost argueably the most important spot on the offense, the QB. I only watched the first half and the last 0:08 of the game, but Dreisbach looked very bad in the first half. Added the the fact that their vaunted running attack was anemic, and their tackling was a lot worse than I expected from a relatively experience defense, they really looked vulnerable. We'll say what Illinois can do against them on Saturday. We'll also see if Carr can make some adjustments. Put it this way, I would rather be playing Michigan twice in Ann Arbor than tOSU and PSU anywhere! Todd -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Todd Jekel todd@ra.me.wisc.edu University of Wisconsin---Madison Solar Energy Laboratory 1500 Engineering Drive Madison, WI 53706 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From todd@ra.me.wisc.edu Wed Aug 30 09:51:08 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 09:51:05 -0500; AA16987 Received: from ra.me.wisc.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 09:51:03 -0500 Received: by ra.me.wisc.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/19Jun95-0754PM) id AA13817; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:52:21 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 09:52:21 -0500 From: Todd Jekel Message-Id: <9508301452.AA13817@ra.me.wisc.edu> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu In-Reply-To: (bbstaple@students.wisc.edu) Subject: Re: Topic: McCullough, Roberson or Stecker? While tension in Badgerland is growing, I pose this question: who will get the most yards this Saturday: McCullough, Roberson or Stecker (in decending depth chart order)? Who will impress the most? Will the young Badger secondary - Campbell, Huntley, Taylor and Suttle - 3 sophomores and a freshman - be able to handle Colorado's speed? No tension here, only anticipation! McCullough. Apparently he has ripped off a couple long ones in practice and scrimmages. McCullough. Probably not. Let's just hope they play as a group and not as individuals. That is what both Messenger/Brown and Nelson/Holt did before them. I say fullback Branden Cantrell is key to the offense. Where would Moss and Fletcher have gone without Montgomery in 1993? Can Cantrell and freshman Cecil Martin step up? I disagree. The fullback is important, but the O-line is the key. This is evidenced by the fact that Montgomery is not in the NFL, but Panos, Raymer and Verstegen are. In addition to Cantrell and Martin, they really like a freshmen, John Waerig (about 240 lbs). Let's hope the line play is at least reminiscent of the past two years. Todd -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Todd Jekel todd@ra.me.wisc.edu University of Wisconsin---Madison Solar Energy Laboratory 1500 Engineering Drive Madison, WI 53706 -------------------------------------------------------------------- From MISKOWSKI@vilas.uwex.edu Wed Aug 30 10:55:24 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 10:55:20 -0500; AA17822 Received: from shaggy.uwex.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 10:55:19 -0500 Received: from by shaggy.uwex.edu; id AB19310; 4.1/42; Wed, 30 Aug 95 10:55:54 CDT Received: From SCOOBY/WORKQUEUE by charon1.uwex.edu via Charon-4.0-VROOM with IPX id 100.950830105452.992; 30 Aug 95 10:55:17 +600 Message-Id: To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu From: "Jon Miskowski, 608/263-0299" Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 10:54:45 CDT Subject: Re: Buffs Priority: normal X-Mailer: WinPMail v1.0 (R1) About Colorado's "vaunted" offensive line. Wisconsin held their own against the CO run last year. Although there were so many quick scores last year from Colorado, its hard to say what they would have done on the ground if they were forced to sustain drives. But assuming Colorado's running game is not as good this year--pretty safe bet, losing Salaam & Stewart and losing both tackles and tight end but they have a good back and return3 big time interior lineman so they are not weak. But the Wisconsin front 7 has to be better this year returning five starters. Maybe improving themselves with Diatelevi/Carter replacing Hein. Spiller for Thompson is a big loss. But if you improve at 6 of 7 positions you should be a lot better. So I'd think Wisconsin can hold their own against the CO run. About the pass...I suspect we'll see a very conservative approach from Wisconsin's def backfield. Might see them take more chances up front to free Maniecki and Saleh and Yocum? to rush the passer leaving Spiller & Jurewicz home to run down draws and screens. Daryl Carter could have a big impact on their pass defense. Not only cause he runs like a safety and probably will get better drops than most linebackers but also because he will punish receivers. And he will make people drop passes and he will force fumbles. He also could be a pretty good blitzing linebacker. Even so I think Colorado will move the ball in the air and the question maybe who will break down first. Here's the starting lineups: Offense: Simmons Castro Vandervelt Gay Stark Wunsch Nyquist Bevell Torian McCullough Cantrell Defense: Saleh Spiller Maniecki Jurewicz Diatelevi Unverzagt Monty Suttle Taylor Huntley Campbell Martin splits time with Cantrell. Carter splits time with Diatelevi. And the Badger offense--must be able to run the ball. I'd say look for them to run right behind Wunsch and Stark. They sure haven't said great things about McCullough lately. I think the best thing they've said is that he has made fewer mistakes than the other backs. Ouch! That sounds like my last job review. Maybe that's a smokescreen but he received more praise the last two years than he has this year. Remembering how fast and strong he was as a freshman, remembering how high they were on him last fall, I can't wait to see him now if he's improved as much as most kids do in that time. Cause when he breaks through the line, he's off to the races. Jon M From tweaver@escmail.orl.mmc.com Wed Aug 30 11:01:57 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:01:55 -0500; AA17902 Received: from sunny.orl.mmc.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:01:51 -0500 Received: from squash.orl.mmc.com by sunny.orl.mmc.com (4.1/GEA Sun server 2.7) id AA04227; Wed, 30 Aug 95 12:01:44 EDT Received: by squash.orl.mmc.com (4.1/1.34.a) id AA00607; Wed, 30 Aug 95 12:01:42 EDT Date: Wed, 30 Aug 95 12:01:42 EDT From: tweaver@escmail.orl.mmc.com Message-Id: <9508301601.AA00607@squash.orl.mmc.com> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Subject: New coaches. The majority of the discussions about Badger football have dealt with the new players. What about the new coaches? Most of the coaches are new or have new responsibilities. Are there any concerns about this? TW From MISKOWSKI@vilas.uwex.edu Wed Aug 30 11:07:44 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:07:40 -0500; AA18003 Received: from shaggy.uwex.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:07:39 -0500 Received: from charon1.uwex.edu by shaggy.uwex.edu; id AA19391; 4.1/42; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:08:13 CDT Received: From SCOOBY/WORKQUEUE by charon1.uwex.edu via Charon-4.0-VROOM with IPX id 100.950830110627.416; 30 Aug 95 11:07:37 +600 Message-Id: To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu From: "Jon Miskowski, 608/263-0299" Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 11:06:13 CDT Subject: Football Replays on Wisconsin Public Televsion Priority: normal X-Mailer: WinPMail v1.0 (R1) Good news for Badger fanatics! Pat Steadman, formerly of Badger Plus, will replace Merritt Norvell(gone to greener pastures) as color commentator for the Wisconsin Public Television taped delay broadcasts of Badger home football games. Pat joins play by play announcer Van Stout in the booth. Tune in to Wisconsin Public Television to see the taped delay broadcast of the Colorado game on Sunday at 1:00 pm. Here's the rest of the season's schedule on Wisconsin Public Television: Sat Sept 23 SMU at 10:30 pm Sat Oct 14 Ohio State at 10:30 pm Sat Oct 28 Michigan State at 10:30 pm Sat Nov 18 Iowa at 10:30 pm Sat Nov 25 Illinois at 10:30 pm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Jon Miskowski Wisc Public Television miskowski@vilas.uwex.edu 608/263-0299 Quote of the Week from Julie Hayward of Madison: "Your recent program on sustainable agriculture was a great tonic, a freshly positive, reassuring, hope- inspiring and valuable presentation of something good around us--thank you!" ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ From djrose@pipeline.com Wed Aug 30 11:17:14 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:17:11 -0500; AA18232 Received: from mail.nyc.pipeline.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:17:08 -0500 Received: from pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com (pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com [198.80.32.44]) by mail.nyc.pipeline.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id MAA19105; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:17:09 -0400 From: "David J. Rosen" Received: (djrose@localhost) by pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) id MAA03450; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:17:08 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:17:08 -0400 Message-Id: <199508301617.MAA03450@pipe4.nyc.pipeline.com> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Cc: djrose@pipeline.com Subject: McCullough On Wed, Aug 30, 1995 10:54:45 AM at Jon Miskowski, 608/263-0299 wrote: >And the Badger offense--must be able to run the ball. I'd say look >for them to run right behind Wunsch and Stark. They sure haven't said >great things about McCullough lately. I think the best thing they've said >is that he has made fewer mistakes than the other backs. Ouch! That >sounds like my last job review. Maybe that's a smokescreen but he >received more praise the last two years than he has this year. >Remembering how fast and strong he was as a freshman, >remembering how high they were on him last fall, I can't wait to see him >now if he's improved as much as most kids do in that time. Cause >when he breaks through the line, he's off to the races. Praise/lack of praise by the coaches could be attributable to many factors other than actual ability. Possibly in McC's case it's a motivational tool. I assume that he hasn't lost any of his physical tools during the extended period he was away. He's still big, strong and fast. The only remaining question I have is his durability, given his injury history. I know at one point there was concern that his back injury of last summer could be a chronic thing, but I've heard nothing about that lately, so maybe he's completely over it. Anyway, if he gets it going, I wouldn't be surprised to see him with at least 25-30 carries on Saturday, with Roberson and Stecker in very secondary roles. DAVID J. ROSEN From Sippycable@aol.com Wed Aug 30 11:37:57 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:37:51 -0500; AA18590 Received: from mail02.mail.aol.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 11:37:47 -0500 Received: by mail02.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA18109 for bucky@cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:37:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 12:37:45 -0400 From: Sippycable@aol.com Message-Id: <950830123744_87103557@mail02.mail.aol.com> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Subject: nfl the Packers resigned Reggie Holt and put him on their practice squad. From JBAAS@leviathan.Calvin.EDU Wed Aug 30 12:38:40 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 12:38:38 -0500; AA19613 Received: from ursa.calvin.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 12:38:35 -0500 Received: from leviathan.calvin.edu by Calvin.EDU (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA14429; Wed, 30 Aug 95 13:38:33 EDT Received: from LEVIATHAN/SpoolDir by leviathan.calvin.edu (Mercury 1.21); 30 Aug 95 13:38:22 EST5EDT Received: from SpoolDir by LEVIATHAN (Mercury 1.21); 30 Aug 95 13:38:14 EST5EDT From: "John Baas" X-Real-Sender: JBAAS.Development.calvin To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 13:38:11 EST5EDT Subject: Re: BUCKY digest 241 Reply-To: jbaas@Calvin.EDU Priority: normal X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail/Windows (v1.22) Message-Id: <2D58B05852@leviathan.calvin.edu> Yesteday I (and several others) wrote: "Less than 4 days to opening kick-off and I'm wondering where everyone is. A year ago my mail box could hardly contain all the pre-season prognostication. Are we all trying to appease the "weauxf gods" or have I been dropped from the list? Please help a Badger exiled to Wolverineland. I need to "hear" some football stuff." ....and today's Digest was packed full of football. Now that's more like it! Regarding the Maize and Blue...I passed up a chance to attend this game. They looked weak, but I think they'll impress this year. A win at Illinois (which I think will happen) really gets them off on the right foot. The running game will come around and the defense really played OK. I'm glad UW doesn't play them this year. JB From glaser@univbkstr.com Wed Aug 30 12:57:37 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 12:57:34 -0500; AA19873 Received: from mrcoffee.univbkstr.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 12:57:32 -0500 Received: from dickens.univbkstr.com (dickens.univbkstr.com [199.183.133.140]) by mrcoffee.univbkstr.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id NAA04671 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 13:27:02 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 13:27:02 -0500 Message-Id: <199508301827.NAA04671@mrcoffee.univbkstr.com> X-Sender: glaser@mrcoffee.univbkstr.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu From: glaser@univbkstr.com (Thomas Glaser) Subject: Re: BUCKY digest 241 X-Mailer: >...and today's Digest was packed full of football. Now that's more like >it! > Where can I get a copy??? ------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Glaser glaser@univbkstr.com University Book Store http://www.univbkstr.com/ 711 State Street (608) 257-3784 Madison, WI 53703 (800) 993-BOOK From morse@inxpress.net Wed Aug 30 13:28:03 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 13:28:01 -0500; AA20360 Received: from ns1.inxpress.net by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 13:27:58 -0500 Received: from d30.inxpress.net (d30.inxpress.net [204.120.4.158]) by ns1.inxpress.net (8.6.5/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA29423 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 1995 13:29:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 13:29:48 -0500 Message-Id: <199508301829.NAA29423@ns1.inxpress.net> X-Sender: morse@inxpress.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu From: morse@inxpress.net (Bob Morse) Subject: Re: Buffs MISKOWSKI@vilas.uwex.edu sez: >About the pass...I suspect we'll see a very conservative approach from >Wisconsin's def backfield. Might see them take more chances up front >to free Maniecki and Saleh and Yocum? to rush the passer leaving >Spiller & Jurewicz home to run down draws and screens. I've heard repeatedly the past couple of weeks that Alvarez intends to "keep it simple," to accommodate all the new kids. Seems those comments have been applied mostly to the O, but I expect that policy would also be in force for the D. With the new speed in the secondary, they'd probably be okay with a just a very few basic/fundamental coverages if they succeed in disguising them, as they've been doing the past couple of years. And, yeah, I agree with the need for a good pass rush. I've seen at least two different Colo fans note that Detmer's weakness is rattling under pressure. (Besides, he's a skinny little lightweight runt who may have a tough time weathering three or four good hits.) >And the Badger offense--must be able to run the ball. I'd say look >for them to run right behind Wunsch and Stark. Sounds like a safe bet, but they DO have to balance in the air, and I believe Bucky's got the horses to do it: veteran QB, good/fast/mature receivers, a capable running game to play-action from, and ... (don't know about their pass blocking until I've seen it). >They sure haven't said >great things about McCullough lately. I think the best thing they've said >is that he has made fewer mistakes than the other backs. Ouch! That >sounds like my last job review. Maybe that's a smokescreen but he >received more praise the last two years than he has this year. I've had a hunch that Barry is doing a LOT of smokescreening this year -- particularly for the D as a whole unit, but probably also for McC as well. Wouldn't surprise me at all if McC has been the #1 RB all along, taking the lion's share of the reps, while Alvarez professes indecision. ============================================================ Bob Morse Email: morse@inxpress.net Badger SoftWerks Voice Phone: 608-437-3348 Mt. Horeb, WI From DEVENSLI@amber.indstate.edu Wed Aug 30 13:53:17 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 13:53:14 -0500; AA20690 Received: from indst.indstate.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 13:53:08 -0500 Received: from amber.indstate.edu by INDST.INDSTATE.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Wed, 30 Aug 95 13:53:20 EST Received: from AMBER/SpoolDir by amber.indstate.edu (Mercury 1.21); 30 Aug 95 13:54:37 GMT-5 Received: from SpoolDir by AMBER (Mercury 1.21); 30 Aug 95 13:54:35 GMT-5 From: "Jonathan C. Enslin" Organization: Indiana State University To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 13:54:28 EST Subject: Re: Buffs Priority: normal X-Mailer: Pegasus Mail/Windows (v1.22) Message-Id: <42912547B@amber.indstate.edu> > I've heard repeatedly the past couple of weeks that Alvarez intends to "keep > it simple," to accommodate all the new kids. Seems those comments have been > applied mostly to the O, but I expect that policy would also be in force for > the D. With the new speed in the secondary, they'd probably be okay with a > just a very few basic/fundamental coverages if they succeed in disguising > them, as they've been doing the past couple of years. And, yeah, I agree > with the need for a good pass rush. I've seen at least two different Colo > fans note that Detmer's weakness is rattling under pressure. (Besides, he's > a skinny little lightweight runt who may have a tough time weathering three > or four good hits.) A speedy secondary makes it much easier to blitz. Also, with a younger secondary, you may want to blitz more often - it gives the receivers and QB less time to exploit a young CBs inexperience. I really don't know what to expect from the defense. Jon *********************************************************************** Jonathan C. Enslin Associate Director of Development Indiana State Univerity Telephone: (812) 237-7609 Terre Haute, IN 47809 FAX: (812) 237-7797 "Gentlemen, this is a football." - Vince Lombardi *********************************************************************** From MISKOWSKI@vilas.uwex.edu Wed Aug 30 14:28:20 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:28:18 -0500; AA21164 Received: from shaggy.uwex.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:28:16 -0500 Received: from by shaggy.uwex.edu; id AC20560; 4.1/42; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:28:51 CDT Received: From SCOOBY/WORKQUEUE by charon1.uwex.edu via Charon-4.0-VROOM with IPX id 100.950830142443.416; 30 Aug 95 14:28:13 +600 Message-Id: To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu From: "Jon Miskowski, 608/263-0299" Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 14:23:35 CDT Subject: Re: New coaches. Priority: normal X-Mailer: WinPMail v1.0 (R1) The majority of the discussions about Badger football have dealt with the new players. What about the new coaches? Most of the coaches are new or have new responsibilities. Are there any concerns about this? No Jon M From MISKOWSKI@vilas.uwex.edu Wed Aug 30 14:30:08 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:30:05 -0500; AA21207 Received: from shaggy.uwex.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:30:03 -0500 Received: from charon1.uwex.edu by shaggy.uwex.edu; id AA20584; 4.1/42; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:30:37 CDT Received: From SCOOBY/WORKQUEUE by charon1.uwex.edu via Charon-4.0-VROOM with IPX id 100.950830142855.256; 30 Aug 95 14:30:01 +600 Message-Id: To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu From: "Jon Miskowski, 608/263-0299" Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 14:28:43 CDT Subject: Re: McCullough Priority: normal X-Mailer: WinPMail v1.0 (R1) Heard Barry speak at lunch today and he said this about McCullough--people have been asking about him ever since he came here. As a freshman he was a skinny kid. Now he's a man. He hit the scales this week and weighed 229 lbs. He can run. He's strong. When he breaks through the line, he's going scare a lot of defensive backs. Jon M From MISKOWSKI@vilas.uwex.edu Wed Aug 30 14:33:28 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:33:26 -0500; AA21221 Received: from shaggy.uwex.edu by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:33:24 -0500 Received: from charon1.uwex.edu by shaggy.uwex.edu; id AA20596; 4.1/42; Wed, 30 Aug 95 14:33:57 CDT Received: From SCOOBY/WORKQUEUE by charon1.uwex.edu via Charon-4.0-VROOM with IPX id 100.950830143213.416; 30 Aug 95 14:33:22 +600 Message-Id: To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu From: "Jon Miskowski, 608/263-0299" Date: Wed, 30 Aug 1995 14:31:43 CDT Subject: Re: Buffs Priority: normal X-Mailer: WinPMail v1.0 (R1) ....speedy secondary makes it much easier to blitz. Also, with a younger secondary, you may want to blitz more often - it gives the receivers and QB less time to exploit a young CBs inexperience. I really don't know what to expect from the defense. In theory. All week they've been playing clip of Rae Curruthers' touchdown agains the Badgers last year. Badgers blitz. The corner tried to bump and run and missed and he caught about a 15 yard pass and went all the way. Jon M From haller@cs.dal.ca Thu Aug 31 10:17:47 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:17:43 -0500; AA01541 Received: from cs.dal.ca by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 95 10:17:39 -0500 Received: by cs.dal.ca id <28170(2)>; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 12:17:32 -0300 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 12:17:25 -0300 From: Kirk Haller To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Subject: Colorado Game Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I believe that Saturday's game is being broadcast by ABC. Does anyone know if it will be a regional or national broadcast? If it is a regional broadcast, would it be shown in any Big Ten market? Anchored in a land where TV is piped in from random locations in the US, Kirk haller@cs.dal.ca From Sippycable@aol.com Thu Aug 31 12:08:16 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 95 12:08:12 -0500; AA02217 Received: from mail04.mail.aol.com by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 95 12:08:10 -0500 Received: by mail04.mail.aol.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id NAA17702 for bucky@cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:08:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 13:08:09 -0400 From: Sippycable@aol.com Message-Id: <950831130807_88058067@mail04.mail.aol.com> To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Subject: Re: nfl Donny Brady was signed by the Saskatchewan Roughriders of the Canadian Football League. From sjemmerich@ENH.NIST.GOV Thu Aug 31 13:23:21 1995 Received: from lucy.cs.wisc.edu by sea.cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 95 13:23:19 -0500; AA02399 Received: from enh.nist.gov by lucy.cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 95 13:23:15 -0500 Received: from cement (cement.nist.gov) by ENH.NIST.GOV (PMDF V5.0-4 #10952) id <01HUQ5BR0MFK00XVN9@ENH.NIST.GOV> for bucky@cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:20:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 1995 14:17:45 -0400 From: sjemmerich@ENH.NIST.GOV (Steven J Emmerich) Subject: Saturday's game televised? X-Sender: sjemmerich@enh.nist.gov To: bucky@lucy.cs.wisc.edu Message-Id: <01HUQ5BR3U6A00XVN9@ENH.NIST.GOV> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT I know I've heard that saturday's football game is 'nationally' televised but by whom? Our local TV listing does not list it. Is it actually regionally televised and possibly available by payperview to the rest of the country? ----------------------- Steve Emmerich sjemmerich@enh.nist.gov (301) 975-6459